http://news.yahoo.com/insiders-israel-attack-iran-200004624--politics.html
YES, eventually quote:
"If the U.S. strategy in 2013 does not produce noticeable changes in Iran's
behavior, then either Israel will convince the U.S. to strike (their
preferred option) or they will go it alone (and the U.S. will share in
the consequences)."
I agree.
YES, probably in the coming months quote:
"The drums of war are beating louder and louder, and the Israelis are
concerned they are running out of time to mount an effective attack on
the Iranian nuclear program. The Israelis have lost the element of
surprise but believe their nation's existence is threatened by the
Iranian program, thus making it likely they will strike Iran in the coming months."
NO, quote:
"Too many Israeli military leaders oppose it, and a strike could be
effective only if complemented by a U.S. strike or supported by
substantial U.S. intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)
and logistics. But a strike against Iran would undermine broader U.S.
interests by embittering many Arabs and some Iranians. The best Western
strategy is to back political opponents in Iran and pursue regime
change. Even if it were ever possible, it is too late now to stop Iran
from acquiring nuclear weapons."
Another ambiguous quote, like o'mahdi's "containability" one at the UN.
It's too late to stop Iran???
No comments:
Post a Comment