Every individual is entitled to an opinion and from what i gathered in this article, Bolsonaro is quoting someone that indicated the new variant "may be welcome". What the person meant by when they said that is anyone's guess. My guess is that it may be perceived as "welcome" because it could help achieve herd immunity.
Then again, for all the good things the WHO says, they appear to contradict themselves almost as often. I mean, do they WANT the pandemic to be over? Do they at least wish Omicron be the last variant? And why does everyone keep using the phrase "pay the price"? It sounds very threatening. Is the concept of herd immunity rejected in whole by the UN? Are vaccines the only option when dealing with the virus? Then why are there pills or other treatments to help fight against it?
Needless to say, there's way too many gray areas when the topic is COVID. It is unrealistic to expect everyone to think exactly alike.
Nenhum vírus que mata é bem-vindo, principalmente se a morte e sofrimentos são evitáveis", declarou Ryan.
Im not sure why Ryan feels the need to state the obvious. Nonetheless, there are people who believe the virus is a depopulation scheme with the most vulnerable (elderly & immunocompromised) as a primary target. And if that's not enough, the vaccines aren't 100% effective. Besides posing the risk of side effects, there have been thousands, if not more people worldwide who have died of COVID in spite of the fact they were vaccinated.
There are just too many gaps within the vaccine approach to deem it the only plausible solution to the problem. Take for instance, the argument posed by Tedros that some places are on their 2nd booster while others haven't even received the first dose.
Everyone appears to be dealing with the issue the best way they see fit. And im not sure there's anything wrong with that.
No comments:
Post a Comment